Digital Twins: Definitions, Lifecycle Intelligence, and Research Outlook

Digital Twins: Definitions, Lifecycle Intelligence, and Research Outlook

Author: Sebastiano Martignano, research strategy advisor -CRF Italy

Abstract

Digital Twins (DTs) are rapidly gaining recognition as a transformative digital paradigm—not merely as tools for visualization or simulation, but as dynamic systems capable of evolving with the physical entities they represent. Unlike traditional simulators, which operate within well-defined parameters and use static or predefined models, Digital Twins aim to accompany the physical system throughout its entire lifecycle, adapting to its changing states, behaviors, and environmental interactions.

This article explores what makes a Digital Twin distinct, how its capabilities differ from conventional simulators, and why its full realization requires strategic research investment—particularly in the direction of adaptive and evolutive modeling.

What Is a Digital Twin? A Dynamic Concept Beyond Simulation

A Digital Twin is a digital counterpart of a physical object or system, continuously updated with real-world data and capable of simulating, predicting, and interacting with that object’s behavior in real time. The twin is not a static model; it is a living digital structure, intended to reflect the object across time, context, and operational conditions.

Whereas a simulator might model an idealized version of a pump, a solar plant, or a reactor under controlled scenarios, a Digital Twin is designed to represent the physical object as it actually evolves, including wear, degradation, reconfiguration, and usage-specific variations.

The Lifecycle Perspective: Multiple States, Changing Models

One of the foundational principles of Digital Twin architecture is the ability to follow the physical system through its full lifecycle. This lifecycle is not linear, and the object does not maintain the same structure, behavior, or operational constraints at all times.

A Digital Twin must therefore be capable of representing:

• Multiple operational states (startup, steady-state, shutdown, maintenance, failure modes)
• Transitions between states, triggered by planned processes or emergent events
• Variations in system behavior, due to environmental interaction or system evolution
• Adaptation to new conditions, including unforeseen usage patterns or environmental contexts

For instance, a wastewater treatment plant may operate under normal flow rates using one process configuration. However, in flood conditions, or when industrial effluents change composition, the plant may enter a new operational state, requiring a different internal logic and process model.

This is especially evident in batch processes, where the same infrastructure undergoes fundamentally different behaviors across stages (e.g., filling, reaction, draining). But in large infrastructures—such as energy networks, transport systems, or multi-unit industrial platforms—these states may be unforeseen, and may emerge from interactions with the environment or system-wide reconfigurations.

From Static Models to Adaptive and Evolutive Digital Twins

In such scenarios, the limitations of a fixed internal model become apparent. A simulator built for normal operating conditions cannot anticipate nor respond to emergent modes of operation.

A Digital Twin must therefore include the capability to:

• Adapt its internal model based on new data and behavior
• Detect when a model no longer describes the system adequately
• Trigger the generation or integration of a new internal model able to respond to novel or extreme environmental scenarios

This leads to the concept of an evolutive Digital Twin: one that not only adjusts parameters but can restructure its own internal representation, incorporating new forms of knowledge or reconfiguring its logic in response to unforeseen changes.

Imagine a port logistics platform whose DT tracks standard cargo handling operations. A geopolitical disruption causes massive delays, shifting flows and operations. The existing twin must now reframe the logistical model to incorporate new storage behaviors, routing constraints, or bottlenecks never observed before. A static simulator would fail here; an evolutive DT would be capable of reconstructing its own logic, or at least signaling that a new model is required.

Strategic Implications: Research, Architecture, and Long-Term Investment

Realizing the full potential of Digital Twins is not just a matter of deploying sensors or building dashboards. It requires:

1. Multi-layered architectures capable of accommodating model transitions
2. Hybrid modeling frameworks combining physical knowledge with data-driven learning
3. Semantic and behavioral descriptors for identifying state transitions and mode shifts
4. Mechanisms for dynamic model substitution, extension, or co-existence

These elements are not fully developed in current industrial applications, and lie at the frontier of ongoing research.

Long-term development of Digital Twins must therefore be recognized as a strategic research challenge, akin to building intelligent systems capable of continuous learning, adaptation, and contextual awareness. This is particularly crucial in sectors where systems face evolving demands and unexpected perturbations—such as energy, water, mobility, and climate-sensitive infrastructure.

Is Digital Twin Just a Hype?

Some critics argue that Digital Twins are little more than a technological rebranding of simulation and monitoring tools. While the term is certainly subject to marketing inflation, the underlying ambition of a Digital Twin—lifelong, adaptive, and co-evolving with its physical counterpart—is a valid and disruptive one.

Market research supports this trend:

• MarketsandMarkets forecasts the global Digital Twin market will grow from USD 10.1 billion in 2023 to USD 110.1 billion by 2028 (CAGR 61.3%).
• Grand View Research estimates a CAGR of 35.7% between 2024 and 2030.
• Market.us predicts a jump to over USD 520 billion by 2033.

These figures suggest more than hype: they signal increasing demand for systems capable of dynamic intelligence, not just visualization.

Conclusion: Digital Twin as a Foundation for Adaptive Infrastructure

The conceptual power of the Digital Twin lies in its ability to evolve with the physical system it represents—across states, behaviors, and even crises. Unlike simulators, it is not designed for static experiments, but for permanent cognitive presence across the lifecycle of the system.

To fulfill this promise, a Digital Twin must:

• monitor reality,
• detect discontinuities,
• transition between states,
• and, ultimately, generate new models to survive and adapt.

Such capabilities do not yet come out-of-the-box. They require a sustained research ecosystem—one that combines systems engineering, machine learning, semantics, and control theory.

Bibliography

• Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (pp. 85–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
• Tao, F., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
• Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016). Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect. In Mechatronic Futures (pp. 59–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5
• Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers From a Modeling Perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143
• Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
• Madni, A. M., Madni, C. C., & Lucero, S. D. (2019). Leveraging Digital Twin Technology in Model-Based Systems Engineering. Systems, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007
• us (2023). Digital Twin Market Size, Trends and Forecast 2023–2033. Retrieved from https://market.us/report/digital-twin-market/
• MarketsandMarkets (2023). Digital Twin Market by Industry, Technology, and Region – Global Forecast to 2028. Retrieved from https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/digital-twin-market-225269522.html
• Grand View Research (2023). Digital Twin Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Application, By Industry, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023–2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/digital-twin-market
• Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358