Toward a Strategic Research Agenda for Adaptive and Federated Digital Twins

Toward a Strategic Research Agenda for Adaptive and Federated Digital Twins

Strategic directions for scalable, adaptive, and interoperable infrastructures

Author: Sebastiano Martignano, research strategy advisor -CRF Italy

Next-Generation Digital Twin Systems

Digital Twin (DT) systems are increasingly expected to operate not merely as digital representations of physical entities, but as intelligent infrastructures capable of supporting real-time coordination, learning, and adaptation in complex, distributed environments. Whether applied to energy systems, logistics networks, or territorial resilience, future DT infrastructures must satisfy a set of cross-cutting functional requirements:

• Adaptability to changing environmental, operational, or systemic conditions.
• Interoperability across platforms, domains, and knowledge representations.
• Scalability across both spatial extent (nodes, regions) and temporal complexity (lifecycles, disruptions).
• Autonomy and Self-Configuration, including the ability to incorporate new actors, resources, or logic without global reprogramming.
• Semantic Legibility, allowing systems to interact meaningfully even in the absence of prior standardization.

To meet these conditions, two complementary lines of research are emerging as foundational:
(1) the development of hybrid digital twin nodes, and
(2) the design of digital twin federations as multi-agent systems.

These lines are not isolated—they intersect at multiple levels, and together form the basis of an integrated approach to real-world, real-scale, and real-time digital infrastructures.

Hybrid Digital Twin Nodes: Modeling Complexity in Operational Contexts

The first strategic line of research concerns the internal architecture of the Digital Twin node: how a single physical system (e.g., a greenhouse, water pump station, PV farm) is modeled, virtualized, and simulated in relation to its own behavior and context.

The key challenge is that real systems are neither purely physical nor purely statistical. They evolve, they fail, they reconfigure—and thus their models must go beyond static equations or black-box regressors. The emerging direction is the development of hybrid models, combining structural physical laws with adaptive, data-driven components.

This line of research addresses:

• The multi-state nature of real systems: operational modes vary based on thresholds, failures, or transitions.
• The evolving boundary between system and environment: requiring models to adapt or restructure over time.
• The integration of real-time data with simulation and prediction: not merely for control, but for strategic foresight.

From a systems perspective, the hybrid DT node becomes a dynamic modeling kernel, whose internal logic can accommodate multiple behavioral regimes, absorb new knowledge, and maintain continuity through reconfiguration. Research must therefore focus on how such kernels are architected, trained, validated, and embedded in operational environments without disrupting continuity.

Federated Digital Twins as Multi-Agent Systems: Coordination Without Centralization

The second line of research shifts from the node to the network: how multiple DT nodes—each autonomous, situated, and self-modeling—can participate in federated infrastructures, where collaboration is possible without structural unification.

This problem is ontologically and operationally distinct from classical distributed systems: in federated DTs, nodes are heterogeneous, unevenly capable, and semantically diverse, yet must engage in mutual understanding and collective behavior.

The most promising conceptual framework is that of the Multi-Agent System (MAS): each DT acts as an agent, possessing local goals, internal logic, and the capacity to perceive and react to external stimuli.

Research in this domain must address:

• How do agents discover one another, share capabilities, and negotiate shared scenarios?
• How is emergent coordination achieved in the absence of a centralized orchestrator?
• How are semantic ambiguities managed across agents that model the world differently?
• What forms of governance, resilience, and accountability are possible in such ecosystems?

Critically, these federations must not only scale technically, but adapt structurally: allowing new nodes to join, fail, recover, or evolve without triggering systemic collapse or global reconfiguration.

 Converging the Two Lines: Toward Federated Adaptive Intelligence

Although distinct in focus—internal modeling vs. external coordination—these two lines of research are deeply interdependent. A federated DT system can only function if:

• Each node possesses sufficient modeling fidelity and adaptability to act coherently within a broader simulation;
• The federation possesses sufficient semantic and procedural flexibility to accommodate node-level heterogeneity without flattening diversity.

What emerges is a new paradigm: federated adaptive intelligence. Not a system designed once and implemented globally, but an infrastructure that grows, learns, and coordinates through interaction. Such a system does not rely on standardization as a prerequisite, but allows interoperability to emerge through composition.

The research agenda, therefore, must be as systemic as the problem itself. It must build architectures that are not only modular, but epistemologically open: capable of integrating partial models, diverse ontologies, and situated forms of reasoning into a shared operational grammar.

Conclusion: Digital Twins as a New Episteme for Systems Design

To realize the promise of Digital Twin infrastructures—whether for climate resilience, circular economy, or industrial optimization—research must move beyond tool development toward architectural, epistemological, and institutional innovation.

This means recognizing DTs not just as interfaces, but as agents of coordination; not just as digital tools, but as autonomous structures of knowledge.

Only by advancing the two strategic lines outlined—hybrid node intelligence and federated agent cooperation—can we approach the kind of infrastructure that adapts, scales, and evolves with the complexity of the world it aims to support.

References

• Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016). Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect. In Mechatronic Futures (pp. 59–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5
• Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358
• Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital Twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (pp. 85–113). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
• Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00049-9
• Jennings, N. R. (2000). On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence, 117(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(00)00021-0
• Madni, A. M., Madni, C. C., & Lucero, S. D. (2019). Leveraging Digital Twin technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems, 7(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010007
• Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital Twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143
• Ziemann, J., & Weidlich, M. (2022). Semantic Interoperability for Digital Twins: Challenges and Research Directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(10), Article 202. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539803
• SAREF. (2021). Smart Applications REFerence Ontology. ETSI Standard TS 103 264. https://saref.etsi.org
• World Bank. (2021). Interoperability as a Digital Public Good: Policy Guide for Collaborative Infrastructure. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

• Digital Twin Consortium. (2021). Digital Twin System Interoperability Framework. Digital Twin Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.digitaltwinconsortium.org
• Digital Twin Consortium. (2024). System of Systems Models Enabling Interoperability for Value Creation. Industry IoT Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.iiconsortium.org
• Jeong, S., Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2020). City Data Hub: Implementation of standard-based smart city data platform for interoperability. Sensors, 20(20), 5857. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205857
• Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021). Physics-informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00049-9
• Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020). Digital Twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access, 8, 21980–22012. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970143
• San, O., Rasheed, A., & Kvamsdal, T. (2021). Hybrid analysis and modeling, eclecticism, and multifidelity computing toward digital twin revolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.14629. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.14629
• Xu, L., Mak, S., Schoepf, S., Ostroumov, M., & Brintrup, A. (2023). Multi-Agent Digital Twinning for Collaborative Logistics: Framework and Implementation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12781. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12781
• Zhou, Y., Fu, Y., Shi, Z., Yang, H. H., Hung, K., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Energy-Efficient Federated Learning and Migration in Digital Twin Edge Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15822. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15822
• Ziemann, J., & Weidlich, M. (2022). Semantic Interoperability for Digital Twins: Challenges and Research Directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(10), Article 202. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539803